Example an error or omission in defining the scope of the project
![Example an error or omission in defining the scope of the project Rather than use a WBS, your team developed a bill of materials to define the project’s work components. A customer review of this document uncovered that a scope change was needed, because a deliverable had not been defined, and a change request was written subsequently. This is an example of a change request that was the result of— a. An external event b. An error or omission in defining the scope of the product c. A value-adding change d. An error or omission in defining the scope of the project Answer: b. An error or omission in defining the scope of the product The bill of materials used for The bill of materials provides a hierarchical view of the physical assemblies, subassemblies, and components needed to build a manufactured product, whereas the WBS is a deliverable-oriented grouping of project components used to define the total scope of the project, providing a structured vision of what has to be delivered. Using a bill of materials where a WBS would be more appropriate may result in an ill-defined scope and subsequent change requests. [Monitoring and Controlling]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbz77AAtsVlG3r61UXQfh_r7VNb4LNXD7R_D2L-ZGtO-FuQsjCFOoyOsVkTmnp3fLaMcLj_vyqKT-YoqzTeTk7Gr8bm4gjNLVtPRhP6OqULqFpRda4gxvKhy63sdxxnttle39b0XiDdRhj/s498/images+%252831%2529-01.jpeg "Example an error or omission in defining the scope of the project Rather than use a WBS, your team developed a bill of materials to define the project’s work components. A customer review of this document uncovered that a scope change was needed, because a deliverable had not been defined, and a change request was written subsequently. This is an example of a change request that was the result of— a. An external event b. An error or omission in defining the scope of the product c. A value-adding change d. An error or omission in defining the scope of the project Answer: b. An error or omission in defining the scope of the product The bill of materials used for The bill of materials provides a hierarchical view of the physical assemblies, subassemblies, and components needed to build a manufactured product, whereas the WBS is a deliverable-oriented grouping of project components used to define the total scope of the project, providing a structured vision of what has to be delivered. Using a bill of materials where a WBS would be more appropriate may result in an ill-defined scope and subsequent change requests. [Monitoring and Controlling]")
Rather than use a WBS, your team developed a bill of materials to define the project’s work components. A customer review of this document uncovered that a scope change was needed, because a deliverable had not been defined, and a change request was written subsequently. This is an example of a change request that was the result of—
a. An external event
b. An error or omission in defining the scope of the product
c. A value-adding change
d. An error or omission in defining the scope of the project
Answer: b. An error or omission in defining the scope of the product
The bill of materials used for
The bill of materials provides a hierarchical view of the physical assemblies, subassemblies, and components needed to build a manufactured product, whereas the WBS is a deliverable-oriented grouping of project components used to define the total scope of the project, providing a structured vision of what has to be delivered. Using a bill of materials where a WBS would be more appropriate may result in an ill-defined scope and subsequent change requests. [Monitoring and Controlling]